Going back nearly five or six months
now, I got into a Twitter conversation with a friend of mine about
the young pitchers for our respective teams we root for. He happens
to be a Cardinals fan, of course, it's no secret, I'm a die-hard Mets
fan.
Via Twitter I was expressing my
excitement for the pitchers Carlos Martinez and Michael Wacha. I
really like both pitchers, and despite playing for the Redbirds, I
really cannot wait to watch their careers unfold.
The particular tweet was, I believe,
about Carlos Martinez, but the question proposed to me was Michael
Wacha or Carlos Martinez. I said "Yes". Then came the
interesting question that has sparked months of pondering and
research and thinking, which was Matt Harvey/Zack Wheeler or
Martinez/Wacha? I could not answer, and really could not until I
think now. (Lots of reason really, but mainly was I just had a new
kid, and of course, that really takes up a lot of time, thought and
energy). But I'm back to thinking baseball and am ready to get this
ball rolling.
I'm going to take the proposition on a
different course though. I will start out by saying, I think the Mets
and Cardinals have very similar young pitchers. I find the trio or
Shelby Miller, Wacha and Martinez very comparable to Harvey, Wheeler
and Noah Syndergaard. With Miller and Harvey being pretty much
mainstays in their respective rotations, and yes I realize Harvey's
status is in flux after TJS, but I expect to him be back at the front
of the rotation come the start of next season. With that said, I'm
going to twist the question just a little bit and ask, who do I like
more, the combo of Wacha/Martinez or Wheeler/Syndergaard.
Even though both Wacha and Martinez
have seen the big leagues for St. Louis, and only Wheeler has for New
York, I still think this is going to be a fun comparison.
I've seen all three of these guys live
except for Noah Syndergaard, but I've watched him a little bit on TV.
I cannot say enough how impressed I am with all four.
Of all four hurlers, I think the guy
with the highest potential is Noah Syndergaard. He's a big 6-foot-6
kid out of Texas. He's got the frame to be a horse of a pitcher who
can log 200-plus innings year after year after year. What really
impresses me with him, is his control of all his pitches. He's got a
burner of a fastball, that tops between 94-97 MPH. His changeup may
be the weakest pitch he has, but over time, he will be very effective
with it. While his fastball is of course his premier pitch, his
curveball is just a tick below it. It is an overwhelming pitch. It is
a classic 1-7 curveball. It has 12-6 movement, with just a hint of
sweep to it. It is a big bender that would start at the left shoulder
of a right handed hitter, and then drop down to just below their
knees. What's so impressive with his curveball already, is the
command and ability to throw it in any count. Watching him in the
futures game, he really overwhelmed guys with that fastball, and
rarely went to the curve, but when he did, it was unhittable.
The Mets acquired Syndergaard as a part
of the RA Dickey deal that sent him to Toronto. Travis D'arnaud was
the premier piece of that deal, but the Mets really got a steal with
Syndergaard being a part of it. I've thought for the longest time the
Mets would not ever stick with him to see him into their rotation.
The obvious need in their line up is a power hitting lefthanded bat.
They somewhat addressed that with Granderson in November, but he does
little to ease our concerns long term. Which is where Syndergaard
comes in. He's nearly major league ready, and could really bring in
quite a haul if the Mets ever put him on the block. A name that has
always been at the forefront of my mind is Carlos Gonzalez. With
Syndergaard's nearly-ready big league arm, that could just about be a
trade you'd make straight up.
As of late, I'm really questioning
whether the Mets are willing to move Syndergaard. The way Sandy
Alderson operates, he's always been a home run guy. But I think with
recent World Series winners, you are beginning to see the importance
and emphasis teams are putting on pitching. For the long term, I
think Syndergaard is a Met, and I think he ends up being a Cy Young
candidate, if not winner in the not so distant future.
After Syndergaard, I see a dead heat
between Zack Wheeler and Carlos Martinez as the guys with the most
upside. Being a Mets fan has me apprehensive to automatically
crown Wheeler the next guy up. If he pans out and is the stud
everyone says he is, I'd give him the nod, but again, because he's
with the Mets organization, there's bound to be something go wrong.
So that takes me to Carlos Martinez.
The comparisons to Carlos and Pedro are
astounding. The two have so much in common, it's unbelievable. After
Pedro retired, everyone said, there won't ever be another Pedro. With
the way he handled himself and played the game, it might be true, and
it might not. But when it comes to other ways, I think we've found
the next one.
If you take away all knowledge of Pedro
Martinez and Carlos Martinez and you were to their size, delivery,
and stuff up against each other, you'd have no idea who is who
because they are almost identical. If you watched the World Series,
you heard Tim McCarver use the phrase "fluid arm motion" to
describe Carlos. That was the way Pedro threw. When Pedro was first
signed and then traded for, it was all about his size, and how he
couldn't be a big league pitcher because he wasn't big enough. The
fluid motion of his arm made up for the lack of size. I've said
before, and I'll say it again, the same holds true for Carlos. His
slider is nearly as nasty as Pedro's, his fastball actually has a few
more ticks to it and really takes off out of his hand, maybe more so
than Pedro's did, though I really only remember watching Pedro when
he was in his prime and towards the end of his career.
Carlos was originally a Red Sox
prospect, maybe now you see why. Because of Visa issues he was sent
back to the Dominican Republic, and the Cardinals signed him nearly a
year later. They really found a gem, and many question whether
Martinez can stick in a rotation, but I have to believe he's going to
get his fair chance to prove himself, and if I had a betters guess,
I wouldn't gamble against him.
He was so dynamic and dominant in the World Series, I would bet he might even get a shot at that third or fourth rotation spot, with a chance to really move up as the season wears on.
He was so dynamic and dominant in the World Series, I would bet he might even get a shot at that third or fourth rotation spot, with a chance to really move up as the season wears on.
If I had to have one drawback to this
young guy, it would be his size. I don't care that he's small, and
throws major gas. He's going to be a stud for many years, but once he
starts to decline, it will really be a sharp decline. We saw it with
Pedro, and we've seen it with many other smaller, aging stud
pitchers. Once the decline comes, it doesn't take long for the
descent to really become a steep one.
If there is one guy I most look forward
to seeing how he develops and matures, it will be this guy. He has so
much potential and I think a lot of doubters in the scouting world
will continue to doubt him, but I look forward to seeing their
bewildered faces as he just tears down those doubts one at a time in
what will be a very illustrious career.
Now for Zack Wheeler. Like I've
previously stated, if you had to make a safe bet on who would be
better, Wheeler or Martinez, the SAFE bet would be Wheeler. I don't
necessarily agree with that, but it is the truth. Wheeler has been a
"can't miss" guy since he really climbed his way through
the lower levels as a high school draft pick. The SF Giants really do
a great job of developing guys like him. The Mets really have just
continued the work the Giants put in on him early on, and he's really
blossomed. He struggled initially in coming to the big leagues last
summer. There was the whole deal with him tipping his pitches and of
course the command issues, but we saw pretty similar things, minus
tipping pitches with Matt Harvey in his initial time with the Mets. I
think Zack Wheeler really turns into a second Harvey this summer.
Wheeler is your traditional fastball,
curveball, and changeup combination. Like most prospects, the fastball is the premier pitch, with a very good moving
curveball to compliment it.
It's a big 12-6 hook that can buckle the best of hitters.
It's a big 12-6 hook that can buckle the best of hitters.
To preface my next point, I will say,
being a former pitcher and student to the art of pitching, I felt as
long as I'd watched Matt Harvey, which was basically his college
days, he had perfect mechanics. I never thought I'd see him succumb
to Tommy John Surgery. Then I started second guessing my knowledge on
mechanics and all that when it came about he'd have to have TJS. Then
I heard an interesting take,which has been disputed among pitching
experts, but I think there's some real legs to the argument; that
Matt Harvey perhaps threw too many of those hard sliders he has. I
think that could be a realistic cause because sliders really do put a
lot of strain on the forearm/elbow area. All that to say, I am not a
huge fan of Wheeler's mechanics (the above picture is a big reason why), and would not be surprised if he's
under the knife in the next couple years.
When Matt Harvey came up, and Mets fans
were waiting to see Wheeler, all we heard was Wheeler is going to be
better than Matt Harvey; Hard to believe given how dominant Harvey
was last year, but a lot of scouts kept with their original
assessments. With Harvey out of the picture, Wheeler has a chance to
be the guy in New York, at least this year. I think he's poised to
have a Matt Harvey type of break out year. I like him a lot as one of
the front guys in the rotation. His mission in the offseason seems to
be to get control of his pitches and be able to throw them in any
count, at any point in the game. That was really what Harvey did last
year. If you were break down the two's track record in the big
leagues, being offset a little bit by timing, their paths and
struggles and everything really seem to be strikingly similar. I
think the combo of Wheeler/Harvey is well on it's way to a pretty
dynamic and dominant tandem.
Of course, we're left with one final
pitcher, but let's not make him out to be the last guy picked for a
game of dodgeball, because well, Michael Wacha to this point may be
the most accomplished pitcher of all these guys. I was very, very big
on the Michael Wacha pick by the Cardinals in the 2012 draft. So much
so, I thought, (and once again, I did not verbalize what was a pretty
accurate prediction) he might be the first pitcher of all the guys
taken in the draft to make it to the big leagues. I thought that much
of him, and to be honest, it's not hard to predict those sorts of
things with guys fresh outta college. Wacha was tremendous at Texas
A&M, and much like Syndergaard, Wacha has the size and frame to
be a big time innings eater year after year after year.
Out of college, Wacha was a two-pitch
thrower. He had the dynamic fastball, and a pretty above-average
change up, but scouts knew then, he'd have to develop a third pitch.
Along with that, I think Wacha may have gone above other guys if he
had a better third pitch, and if his arm slot wasn't so out of wack
if you will.
But the Cardinals saw something probably not a lot of people saw, and that was an incredible resemblance of their ace Adam Wainwright.
But the Cardinals saw something probably not a lot of people saw, and that was an incredible resemblance of their ace Adam Wainwright.
Wacha was able to dominate the college
ranks and even to a degree the minor leauges with that big fastball
and devastating change up, but to succeed at the big league level,
he's going to have to develop a third pitch. That became incredibly
evident when in the sixth game of the World Series the Red Sox teed
off on the rookie who'd tore his way through the postseason and
announced his arrival in a booming manner. I said it then, I said it
as he arrived, and I still maintain it, Michael Wacha will be an ace
type of pitcher when he establishes a breaking pitch.
As I watch Michael Wacha throw, I think
it's almost inevitable he's going to have TJS at some point. That
much stress on an elbow is just not sustainable. Adam Wainwright met
that same fate, and has since been back for some pretty solid years
since. I think Wacha can certainly do the same. I'm not saying Wacha
is going to go down next year, or the year after, but I do think if
he's going to log major innings like he should, that's almost a
guarantee he will have a new elbow.
The beauty of where Michael Wacha is
developmentally, is he can probably join the Cardinals rotation,
which he should, right out of spring training and be somewhat
successful and effective. All the while working to develop that third
pitch, which I would bet is his #1 goal this offseason. I would say
roughly by the middle of next year, we could be talking about Michael
Wacha as one of the leagues top pitchers and he should be a perennial
all-star for years and years to come.
Of all the blogs I've done so far, this
one is maybe my favorite. I also enjoyed my future look into MajorLeague Baseball. I love watching and talking about young players and
projecting them. I could go on and on all day probably about these
four guys, but this is just a brief synopsis of what I see for them
and where I think they can go. Of course there is likely bumps in the
road for all of them, and it will be interesting to see how they all
handle it. They are all well on their way to getting big money, and
having tremendous careers.
Other pitchers I'm looking forward to
watching develop as we go through the next couple years:
Alex Colome - RHP Tampa Bay Rays
Archie Bradley - RHP Arizona
Diamondbacks
Casey Kelly - RHP San Diego Padres
Dylan Bundy - RHP Baltimore Orioles
Henry Owens - LHP Boston Red Sox
Kyle Zimmer - RHP Kansas City Royals
Rafael Montero - RHP New York Mets
No comments:
Post a Comment